Long-Term Foreclosure Backlogs To Blame for Homes with Underwater Mortgage
Two recent reports have highlighted the unwanted yet very real link between foreclosure and homes with an underwater mortgage. One report found the foreclosure process is moving so slowly throughout half of the country, it could take decades to clear millions of delinquent and foreclosed homes. In the second separate report, the delayed foreclosure process was blamed for a sharp increase homeowners saddled with negative equity.
Backlogged Foreclosure Could Take Decades to Clear
New research conducted by LPS Applied Analytics, which collects data on nearly 40 million mortgage loans, revealed that it will take more than eight years on average to clear the nation’s 2.1 million homes in foreclosure or with seriously delinquent mortgages– and in some states, the backlog could last for decades.
The researchers say the time frame is nearly double what they would have estimated just one year ago before the mortgage industry fell victim to robo-signing scandals, which revealed mortgage servicers were illegally foreclosing homeowners without taking the proper filing procedures.
Shortly after the scandal was discovered a foreclosure freeze was implemented, creating a backlog. Since then, mortgage servicers have been forced to review millions of homes facing potentially improper foreclosure and possibly reimburse homeowners wrongfully foreclosed.
Servicers in court-required states like New York and New Jersey will now have to revisit former homes on foreclosures, creating a backlog which will take as many as 50 years to clear, according to researchers.
Increase in Underwater Mortgage Homes Blamed
A separate report released on Tuesday by Zillow, a real estate website, revealed that a significant 28.6 percent of homeowners were saddled with an underwater mortgage in the third quarter of this year. This is a dramatic increase from 26.8 percent in the second quarter.
According to the report, the rising percentage of underwater mortgages is due largely to how long the foreclosure sale process takes rather than home value fluctuations. It explained that while the negative equity rate was already high in 2010 (hovering around the 21 to 23 percent rate) the range changed to 26 to 28 percent after the robo-signing scandal came to light, and hasn’t moved.
With unemployment still resting at 9 percent and many underwater homeowners opting for “strategic default,” by simply choosing to turn in their keys rather than try to sell at a loss in the tough housing market, there are sure to be more homes to face foreclosure in the near future.
While the report says housing prices should bottom out by the end of 2012, market recovery is something we may not see anytime soon.
Jumbo Strategic Default
Jumbo Mortgage Holders Now ‘Greater Strategic Default Risk’
by Ken Harney
A jumbo problem in the works?
Do you have a big mortgage and good credit scores but not much equity — maybe you’re even underwater? Do you see little chance that your home’s market value will improve a lot during the coming three to seven years?
If you answered yes to both questions — and thousands of homeowners across the country could do so — new research suggests that you are in a category that lenders need to worry about most: Prime jumbo borrowers who once were thought to be among the safest bets, but who now are the most likely to opt for a strategic default and walk away from their homes.
In a study released Oct. 31, the ratings agency Moody’s said that based on its analysis of mortgage-backed bond portfolios, homeowners with jumbos now constitute “greater strategic default risk” than any other type of borrowers, including subprime. That’s because an exceptionally high number of jumbo owners — many located in high-cost markets hit by real estate deflation over the past several years — are stuck with persistent negative equity. More than half of the jumbos analyzed by Moody’s where owners are still making payments have home market values lower than their outstanding loan balances.
Jumbo loans are those that exceed the conventional limits of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Nationally, that ceiling is $417,000, but in high-cost areas between 2008 and Oct. 1 of this year, conventional limits ranged as high as $729,750. The maximum in those high-cost areas is now $625,500.
Meanwhile, Fair Isaac Corp., developer of the ubiquitous FICO credit score, says strategic defaults — where owners who can afford to keep paying their loans but see no economic rationale for doing so — continue to be a “growing problem.” More than an estimated 12 million mortgages are now underwater, and 30 percent of all defaults on loans are strategic, according to Joanne M. Gaskin, FICO’s predictive analytics director.
Fair Isaac recently created a new type of score designed solely to spot potential strategic defaulters before they hand back the house keys. At least four of the top 10 largest lenders and servicers already are using it, contacting high-risk borrowers, offering financial solutions plus information about the costs associated with strategic walkaways. The company claims its score can spot the riskiest homeowners, some of whom show telltale characteristics that make them as much as 110 times more likely to walk away than the least-risky borrowers.
Though FICO has not disclosed the specific risk combinations in the mathematical models supporting its proprietary score, the company confirms that among them are good credit scores and payment performance on debts, low balances of outstanding revolving credit, and a relatively short period of ownership of their current homes.
In an interview, Gaskin lifted the lid on the FICO black box a smidgen more. Using a wide variety of data — including property values, historical valuation trends along with standard FICO scores and other information in credit bureau files — the strategic default score essentially tries to get inside homeowners’ heads in order to predict their future behavior.
“We’re trying to understand [the situation] from the consumer’s perspective,” she said. “How much have I lost on the value of my home? What is the velocity of change” — that is, how fast have I lost market value, and is my situation getting worse? How long will it take to recapture what I’ve lost?
When the answers are grim and the prospects for equity recovery distant, the probability that the owners will plot a strategic departure — often characterized by an abrupt halt to mortgage payments while staying current on credit cards and car payments — goes up sharply.
“Most consumers have a pretty good idea of what the market is doing” in their local neighborhoods,” said Gaskin.
What they often don’t know, however, are the penalties they face for walking away. These include triple-digit drops in their credit scores — which will hamper their ability to rent a house or obtain credit for years — plus the possibility that lenders will find a way to seek recovery of whatever they owe after foreclosure proceedings. About a dozen states, including California, restrict “deficiency” recoveries. But in most states, lenders are free to pursue whatever assets they can locate, and often do so if the amount of unrecovered debt is large enough to justify the legal expenses.
Ultimately, strategic default for many owners boils down to a calculation: Are the costs, financial and otherwise, worth the relief from an albatross house and mortgage? If the Moody’s study is accurate, thousands of jumbo borrowers are struggling with that very calculation right now, and a lot of them are likely to bail.
Ken Harney’s email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.